The World Health Organization has been caught up in a real mess by trying to categorize and create hurdles for collaboration with the growing number of non-State actors that are active in public health matters related to the mission of the WHO. The complexity of this mess was in the spotlight at the recent WHO Executive Board, meeting from 23 to 27 January 2018. Several agenda items touched on the issue, including ongoing attention to addressing the challenges of non-communicable diseases for healthy lifestyles. More knotty agenda items, however, had to do more directly with WHO’s relations with non-State actors – both its new but yet to be implemented basic Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (FENSA) generally and its guidelines for managing conflict of interest in the nutrition world more specifically. The outcome of the deliberations on these agenda items is rather encouraging, and we hope that the new Director-General will actually clean up the mess.
We live in a world of ever accelerating change, driven by the creativity of individuals and groups. In this context, it is useful to reflect on the role of innovation as a stimulus for creativity. We focus our attention here on innovation, and specifically on how innovation is being interpreted to be “at the heart” of the policies, services, information and cooperation of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Our interest is primarily directed to reflecting on how the trends reported by WIPO in measuring innovation and intellectual property are symptomatic of – and possibly even contributing to – the dramatic shifts in the geopolitical landscape. These shifts are having significant spill over effects beyond WIPO and especially, in these remaining days of 2017, at the World Trade Organization but also, if one looks to the opening days of 2018, at the World Health Organization. Continue reading “The Importance of Innovation”
We have long been a fan of the Internet Governance Forum as a leading experiment in inclusive multi-stakeholder engagement at the global level. In our last newsletter (11 December 2017), we wrote an anticipatory commentary on the 12th IGF, which was meeting in Geneva from 18 to 21 December 2017. We had the opportunity to mingle with IGF delegates and to attend a few of the over 230 sessions that were held over five days (the official four days but also an extra day “zero” on 17 December to help deal with the overload). As usual, we came away with the impression of multiple voices – or sounds, as it were, like the warming up of an orchestra before the conductor comes on stage. Continue reading “Internet Governance Forum – Governance Debate”
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was the pivotal event of 2015, a year advertised for its transformational summits – on disaster relief in Sendai, on financing for development in Addis Ababa and on climate change in Paris. One might have assumed that the euphoria of the 2030 Agenda would translate directly into implementation strategies in 2016. While one could argue that it was premature to expect such an immediate shift to the new ways of thinking that the 2030 Agenda called for, 2016 also proved to be the year for catastrophic political events which effectively slowed down any hints of first steps. Continue reading “SDGs Are Taking Root”
The Global Social Observatory (GSO) concluded its operations as a non-state actor based in Geneva, Switzerland with a “celebratory” interactive dialogue on Tuesday, 19 December 2017. The GSO mission has been to facilitate an inclusive dialogue in a neutral forum for people to listen to different points of view and to engage in a search for common solutions. Trade and labour standards, HIV/AIDS and social responsibility, gender and trade, collaborating on non-communicable diseases, preventing and managing conflicts of interest on nutrition, and breaking the silos for disruptive action against hunger are examples of the issues that the GSO has taken on since its founding in 2004. The Management Committee has decided that it is time to move on, with confidence that the friends and supporters of the GSO will take the lessons learned from this collaborative experience in the multiple new directions that are opening up for transformative change today.
Thematic presentations by special guests David Nabarro, Francis Gurry and Johanna Ralston here with Katherine
We signed up for the 2017 UN Forum on Business and Human Rights with some trepidation because of its chosen theme of “Realizing Access to Effective Remedy”. This is the third pillar in the UN Guiding Principles, supplementing the guidance on state duty to protect human rights (the first pillar) and on the business responsibility to respect human rights (the second pillar). The third pillar, recognizing the importance of having effective remedies to human rights violations, has been deemed the weakest pillar but one that seemed to evoke the most complaints in past forums. Much to our surprise, the 2017 Forum and its thematic focus went more smoothly- and more constructively – than we had expected. Read more here. Continue reading “Remedies and Other Initiatives at the UN Business and Human Rights Forum”
The theme of “the future of work” has been catching our attention – and the attention of many deliberative bodies this year. Both the G20 and G7 have launched initiatives related to this theme, and we certainly saw how it permeated special sessions at the International Labour Organization in April and June and at the WTO Public Forum in September. Our intern Jacob Haddad had the opportunity last week to attend events featuring more updated insights into the murky world of fortune-telling about jobs and sustainable livelihoods. One was a Trade Dialogue event at the WTO on 30 October, another was a stimulating panel at the Graduate Institute, and yet another was a more pragmatic review by the ILO Governing Body on how the ILO is preparing to deliver a definitive ILO perspective on the future of work at its Centenary celebrations in 2019. Of course, we also appreciate the ongoing deliberations of the ILO’s Governing Body on so many related issues, as noted in our commentary below. Continue reading “The Future of Work”
Global water governance – or “hydrodiplomacy” as enthusiasts describe it – has suffered from a lack of a specific international agency or treaty to serve as an oversight body with any clout. Even though there is an inter-agency body, UN Water, that meets at least once a year, its function is primarily to coordinate and channel UN inputs into an annual report for World Water Day in March of each year. It does not have any governing role. However, much like its physical qualities – fluid and easily transformed (from ice, to steam, etc), water permeates almost everything we know and operates as an issue in almost every international setting. No wonder there are so many disparate initiatives associated with global water issues! On the occasion of the major annual event on water – not World Water Day in March but the World Water Week in August in Stockholm – we reflect on the state of play regarding these disparate initiatives. We do agree that water is looming as the greatest risk to sustainable development, and we do wonder if the haphazardness of uncoordinated streams might eventually converge or simply dry up. Read more here.
From the CMMD Geneva Observer 14 August 2017
As we followed the Bastille Day celebrations – and commemorations – in Paris and Nice this past week, we were quite struck by the spill-over implications for global policy of the return visit of the US President to Europe. He had already appeared at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, preceded by an interesting side visit to Warsaw, the G7 Summit in Taormina and the NATO gathering in Brussels. Media attention has been quite taken by the bilateral meetings that these various gatherings have facilitated. It is no wonder that the bilateral interplay between the US and French Presidents in Paris could be interpreted as a continuation of this phenomenon, even as the larger global political scene of multilateral prognostications is the essential backdrop for giving these bilateral encounters their substance. We are especially interested here in the outcome and immediate aftermath of the Hamburg G20 Summit. Read more here.
From the CMMD Geneva Observer 17 July 2017